In many fields, artificial intelligence can be seen as a threat to a major part of the professions that may soon be more and more easily replaced by robots. For better or for worse… With this guideline on the horizon, many see a dystopian future with no way back, while some still manage to see it as a new playground for exploration, both technically and metaphysically. Presented at the SAT for the second time, the Empty Vessels project by David Gardener (Montreal Life Support) and Greg Debicki (Woulg), combines music, robotics, and artificial intelligence in an innovative way, to see how a robotic AI could inhabit an experimental cello concerto by itself. Developed from the latest research in the field, a network of artificial neurons is connected in symbiosis with the cello through four rotating bows, which constitute the visible luminous heart of the machine. Even if the machine manages to occupy the space and replace the human on stage, Empty Vessels has the potential to transform the frightening vision of the self-destructive and inhuman nihilistic void into a fertile and organic meditation on emptiness. Through lines of code the performers finally manage to hide, within their empty vessels, the sincere memories of a child learning, naively and sometimes clumsily, to master his new instrument.


PAN M 360: David, you do light, sound, and kinetic sculptures with your Montreal Life Support project. Would you like to talk about your background?

Montreal Life Support: I grew up in the UK and I worked as a design engineer for experiential architecture companies and that’s basically where I developed my skillset in terms of electronics and mechanical engineering. I then established my own practice and I started building products for myself as a visual artist and designer. I moved to Montreal about five years ago and I renamed myself Montreal Life Support. It’s a reference about culture dying in the UK for some time now, big businesses are pushing all the artists out of London. Montreal is my life support because there is so much culture and DIY venues here.

PAN M 360: What about you Greg? You are the one behind the algorithm programming. Would you like to share your background too?

Woulg: I studied new media art at Alberta University of the Arts. I was interested in making interactive installations or really long format performances, of 12 hours or longer for example. From there, I got interested in creative coding and that sort of thing. When I left school, I realized that the art I was interested in was way too expensive for a normal person’s budget. But I kept making music and that’s where most of my energy went for a long time. I make lots of plugins and interfaces for my music performances. That’s where the art programming came from. I have a big interest in generative music, in AI and especially the neural network coming from the new wave of AI research.

PAN M 360: Would you like to talk a bit about how you developed the project?

Montreal Life Support: I was designing and building the robots to be able to play the cellos. The cellos are built for human bodies, they are very curvy, there is no flat surface, and there is nothing to attach anything to. A lot of the development was working out a way that you can build a robot that can interface with an organic form. Most robots work on two or three axes in a linear way. This one had to be built completely from scratch to fit the cello. It’s still in development, it’s version 2.5 now.

Woulg: There are AI for generating classical, jazz, or pop melodies. We really wanted to try to make something that felt more like electronic experimental music. For generating that, there is no open-source for electronic experimental cello music (laugh). We generated a bunch of writing and chord progressions that we liked so that we could train the AI on things that were to our taste.

PAN M 360: Do one of you know how to actually play the cello?

Montreal Life Support: I grew up playing the cello. It sets it apart from other instruments because you can play infinite notes. In that respect, it is very organic. The knowledge on how to play helped the robot develop its full sound.

PAN M 360: One of the first questions that come to mind when we see the show is where is the bow? According to you, does it start at the software or is it at the end of the robotic structure? Or is the whole robotic AI considered as the bow?

Montreal Life Support: Physically, there is a small rotating bow on each string. The reason for doing that is to play the four strings at the same time. With a normal cello, you can play one string or two at a time. So we wanted to play as many notes as we wanted. You can hear the loop of the circle.

Woulg: It reminds me of the mellotron. There is a certain quality to the loop of the bow turning. In a certain way, it opens new and different possibilities to play the cello and it closes the possibilities of a normal cello at the same time.

Montreal Life Support: The title Empty Vessels refers to the absence of human presence. Removing the bow hits home to this emptiness of humanity. You are just left with the instrument.

Woulg: So the bow is missing…

PAN M 360: For now, you can hear the stop-start mechanical rhythm of the robotic AI. How do you feel about it?

Montreal Life Support: The goal is that it matches the fluid sound of a human playing. The bows are made of plastic, you can hear it in the sound as well. It makes the sound more aggressive. The end goal is to play beautiful string music.

Woulg: In this version, we liked those kinds of stop-start mechanical sounds. Conceptually, that’s an important part of the piece. Sometimes, there is that kind of scraping that makes me think of futurism in music where they had the sounds of trains and scraping metal.

PAN M 360: How autonomous is the robotic AI so far?

Woulg: Right now, it’s not autonomous. It can generate music, chord progressions, and rhythms. The fun part of working with AI is that in a fraction of seconds you have 10 000 hours of music. The hard part is finding the good bits. Learning about neural networks and what is possible changed the music we ended up with, in the project. We are not at the stage where we can press a button and it plays forever. Hopefully, we’ll have that in the next version.

PAN M 360: According to you, who plays the cello? You or the robotic AI?

Woulg: For now, it’s kind of both I would say. To a certain extent, we’re going to have to be the interpreter of what the AI spits out.

The name Gus Engle might ring a bell for snowboarding fans, but the music of Gus Englehorn reminds us of the joys of childhood—when you would make up fantastical stories, deep in the woods with your friends. A past professional snowboarder and now a full-fledged musician, Gus Englehorn’s second album, Dungeon Master, released later this week, is a bizarre and refreshing piece of avant-garage pop-rock.

His lyrics feel like they are pulled from chimeric short stories filled with wizards, horses, spiders, and surreal unexplained locations. In a music industry full of insipidity, Gus Englehorn, proves that you can be whoever you want.

The instrumentation on Dungeon Master is studded with jangly guitars, sparkly synths, glockenspiel, and hazy drumming, as Gus leads you on his darkened odyssey. It’s quite hard to feel bored with Dungeon Master. It feels like a choose your own adventure saga.

We caught up with the Alaskan-born, now Montreal-based singer-songwriter to learn about his inspirations, love of fantasy, and his wife Estée Preda—who plays drums on his albums and has been cited as sounding like Moe Tucker (drummer of The Velvet Underground) on salvia.

PAN M 360: I haven’t really heard anybody with your sound before, which is always really fun for me, because I interview musicians all the time. When you’re like writing your songs, do you write in the vocals screams or like drawn-out “ahhhhhs?”

Gus Englehorn: It’s kind of me just playing the guitar and freestyling lyrics over the top. Most of the stuff comes off the top of my head. Like my wife will be making a painting and I’ll be trying to make her laugh with some crazy lyrics and stuff. I don’t think I’ve ever written down a big drawn-out “ahhhh” or anything (laughs).

PAN M 360: So the lyrics are based more on the feeling you get from the guitar or other instruments?

Gus Englehorn: Yeah it happens one of two ways. Either I write down a short story and put music to that or I come up with little stories as I’m playing.

PAN M 360: Is that where the title Dungeon Master comes from? Are you writing little Dungeons & Dragons stories?

Gus Englehorn: I’ve always been really into fantasy, like video games, books, and movies, but the title came from one of my shows actually. By the time I was doing the launch for the first album, Death and Transfiguration, I had a partially finished version of the song “The Gate,” and this guy was yelling “encore” so I played it. And the same guy came up to me after and was like ‘Man, I love your lyrics it kind of reminds me of Dungeons & Dragons. You’re like the Dungeon Master up there, leading us through this crazy campaign.’ So it kind of gave me a direction to go of me as this Dungeon Master omnipotently leading you through these strange situations.


PAN M 360: I think the title for the album definitely makes sense. I mean, “Exercise Your Demons” is very much like a necromancer casting a spell on you.

Gus Englehorn: Yeah exactly. I guess that was the vibe I’m going for (laughs).

PAN M 360: That song “Terrible Horse” also really stuck with me. It seems very stream of consciousness?

Gus Englehorn: That’s one of my favourites on the album. That one, I just imagined this terrible horse who kicks his master and goes and runs off, and then, he drinks from a poison river. His soul leaves his horse body and he’s in Hell and he tries to escape. And it’s also about a party animal, like a person who has a drinking problem and is drinking from the poison river and just getting rude. I guess it’s a little fable. A lot of them on this album are little fables I guess.

PAN M 360: You were a professional snowboarder before you were a musician. What led you to making music?

Gus EngleHorn: So I think I like started playing guitar when I was like 16 and I was just kind of like writing songs the whole time I was snowboarding. I would always kind of do it. But yeah, I think I was imagining a day when I would become maybe too old to snowboard and I was like ‘Well I need to do something. I don’t wanna just curl up and die.’ So I kept trying to write songs and then when snowboarding did end I still didn’t really know how to write songs even though I had been trying for years and years. So there was a period of three to four years where I was really trying to learn how to write music. Like waking up and trying to make a demo or something. Then I made that first album after like three or four years of being broke with no job.

PAN M 360: And when you were constantly trying to write songs what did you use as inspiration? Other music?

Gus Englehorn: I think the reason I write songs is just to sort exercise my imagination and be as creative as I can. So a lot of it comes from that desire to explore new ideas. But then there are influences from films and different art movements like the surrealism and the Dada movement. And then there are bands like The Pixies, Daniel Johnston, Leonard Cohen, and then my own personal experiences I suppose.

PAN M 360: And your wife, Estée, is your drummer. How did she start playing drums for your music?

Gus Englehorn: Well we had already been dating for 10 years when I released that first record. We had a different iteration of the band where we were both playing guitars and we tried to play with other people but it never really worked out. Then eventually she just hopped on drums and it really seemed to click. She can kind of do anything. She’s very musically inclined.

PAN M 360: Does she help with the lyrics at all?

Gus Englehorn: That’s just me, but before we go into the studio she adds drums and we make little demos and we both try to come up with different arrangements. But sometimes she’ll come up with a lot of the basslines and glockenspiel stuff.

PAN M 360: You’ve lived in many places—Alaska, Salt Lake City, Hawaii—would you say that has an influence on your trajectory as a musician or creative person?

Gus Englehorn: Yeah I think so. I think just being in Alaska seems to do something to your brain. You kind of feel like you’re hidden away from the world and there are a lot of colloquialisms and individuality there and lots of unique characters. So I think you just feel free to do what you will. So it had an influence on my ideas of being an individual.

PAN M 360: Have you had any opportunities to play a show there?

Gus Englehorn: We did play one last summer in my hometown, a fishing village called Ninilchik. It was called Salmon Fest and it was kinda a Bluegrass festival. But people were pretty cool and I think some were a little horrified. Alaskan festivals can get pretty crazy too. When we were playing it was like pouring rain and by the end of the set, there was like a pile of people mud wrestling. It was pretty crazy and I think stuff like that only happens in Alaska.



For its last concert of the Cartes Blanches series, Pro Musica invites music lovers to travel musically in Eastern Europe. Brian Manker, cello, and Angela Park, piano, will perform a repertoire focusing on works by Rachmaninov, Martinu and Kaprálová.

 So let’s meet Angela Park, in order to know more about this excellent pianist’s career, about her duet with Brian Manker and the pieces to perform on Sunday, 3 PM, at the Phi Center.

PAN M 360: First, we’d like to know more about you! Where were you trained as a chambrist and a soloist?  

ANGELA PARK: I studied solo performance at Western University, the University of Toronto, and the Université de Montréal. Chamber music has always been a large part of my musical education. I began playing in a piano trio when I was 13 and have always loved collaborating in various instrumental combinations ever since. I met one of my duo partners, violist Sharon Wei, when we were undergraduate students at Western University. Even during our studies, we sought out ways to keep playing together, and this has fed into my professional career. 25 years later, Sharon and I are still thinking up all kinds of projects together!

PAN M 360: Who were your main professors?

ANGELA PARK: James Anagnoson, Ronald Turini, William Aide, Jacob Lateiner, Paul Stewart. I have been lucky to meet and be inspired by each of these artists, who were each wonderful teachers as well. 

PAN M 360: Who were or still are your pianistic role models?

ANGELA PARK: There are so many I love to listen to, including Richter, Horowitz, Argerich, Nikolayeva. Listening to recordings of my past teachers also continue to inspire me. 

PAN M 360: How would you describe your pianistic personality? 

ANGELA PARK: I have been told I am a sensitive listener 😊. 

PAN M 360: Do you have favourite composers or periods of classical music?

ANGELA PARK: Composers I feel most close to as a performer are Mozart, Schumann, Debussy, Rachmaninoff. I also love the process of commissioning and playing new works of today’s composers. Some composers whose music I have really gravitate to are Barbara Croall, Omar Daniel, Kevin Lau, and Darren Sigesmund (who happens to be my husband!). 

PAN M 360: Do you see yourself more as a chamber musician or a soloist?

ANGELA PARK: My career has taken me much more in the chamber music realm. I try to maintain a schedule of learning solo repertoire and playing recitals whenever possible, as I feel that solo playing helps ensemble playing, and vice versa. 

PAN M 360: What are your favorite contexts for performing live or recording? 

ANGELA PARK: Some of the most moving experiences as a performer have been for the organizations Concerts in Care and Xenia Concerts. Playing for those that cannot access concerts elsewhere is very meaningful and important. I love playing and recording with musical partners that I have a long friendship with, as it makes the whole experience more personal and gratifying. 

PAN M 360: Where are you based? 

ANGELA PARK: I recently moved from Toronto to London, Ontario, which happens to be where I was born and grew up. I currently teach piano and collaborative piano at Western University. 

She is a founding member of the JUNO Award-winning Made in Canada Ensemble and the renowned Mercer-Park Duo with cellist Rachel Mercer. Rachel and Angela performed with violinist Yehonatan Berick as part of the AYR Trio from 2010 to 2020.

PAN M 360: As we can observe, piano duet with cello is something that you know very well. So let’s talk about the piano-cello duet: Do you still perform with Rachel Mercer? 

ANGELA PARK: Yes, Rachel and I still collaborate extensively as a cello-piano duo. I met Rachel in 2006 and she continues to be a huge inspiration and important friend and musical partner. We also have other collaborative projects in the works. 

PAN M 360: Is this collaboration with Brian Manker a long-term collaboration? 

ANGELA PARK: This is our first recital together, and I certainly hope to do more in the future! Brian and I are playing in a piano quartet formation this summer in Ahuntsic, along with violinist Andrew Wan and violist Sharon Wei. 

PAN M 360: Can you tell us how and when you began playing with Brian Manker?

ANGELA PARK: I met Brian when I lived in Montreal around 2006, and I had a chamber coaching with him around that time that is still memorable. We played the “Trout Quintet” together many years ago in Westben, and a highlight of that concert was playing with Brian. He brings so much vibrancy and beauty to the music. I am very excited to be collaborating with him for this Pro Musica concert as a duo. 

PAN M 360: Do you have some other gigs for piano-cello duets?

ANGELA PARK: Rachel and I have recitals coming up in the next season mostly in Ontario (KW and Cobourg). 

PAN M 360: What are the specific qualities of this duet with Brian Manker?

ANGELA PARK: Brian brings such a positive energy to everything, and his playing is so effusive and full of colour. I will certainly be inspired by these qualities and I know it will be an invigorating experience. 

Here is the MTL setlist:

Sergei Rachmaninoff, Sonata for Cello and Piano in G minor, Op.19

Bohuslav Martinů, Variations on a Slovak theme, H.378

Vítězslava Kaprálová, Ritournelle for piano and cello, op.25 

PAN M 360 : Can you please comment on each piece?  What are the specific challenges for the duet and each instrument? 

ANGELA PARK: This is a beautiful program that displays the cello and piano in a soulful way. The Kaprálová and Martinu are new works for me, and I am thrilled to discover them. The Kaprálová is a bright and energetic work and I hear the influence of Martinu, who she studied with. I have always loved Martinu and the way his chamber music comes together so uniquely like clockwork. This work also has some amazing melodies and dance-like themes. Rachmaninoff is fiendishly difficult, but so worth it to bring this dramatic, deeply expressive work to life. 

PAN M 360: What are your ongoing projects, concerts or recording sessions?

ANGELA PARK: I have upcoming performances and recording projects with violinist Scott St. John and Rachel Mercer featuring the music of Kevin Lau. Other collaborations I am excited about include playing concerts with Sharon Wei, Rivka Golani, Susan Hoeppner, James Campbell. Rachel and I are also a trio with violinist Mayumi Seiler, and I have piano duo projects with Stéphan Sylvestre. Upcoming solo events include recitals across Ontario.

Angela Park received her Master of Music degree from the University of Toronto and her doctorate in piano performance from the University of Montreal. From 2011-2014, Angela was a Visiting Assistant Professor at Indiana University’s Jacobs School of Music, where she taught the woodwind accompaniment course. She has performed in Ottawa, Winnipeg, Toronto. Angela has recorded with cellist Rachel Mercer and the Made In Canada Ensemble, and has recorded various projects for the Enharmonic label in Bloomington, Indiana. In 2021, her album “Mosaic” with the Made In Canada Ensemble won a JUNO Award for Classical Album of the Year. She has won numerous awards and honors including the Grace Welsh International Piano Prize in Chicago, the Canadian National Music Festival, the Honens International Piano Competition and the Maria Canals International Piano Competition in Barcelona. 

Principal cellist with the Orchestre symphonique de Montréal since 1999, Brian Manker pursues a diverse musical career as a performer and teacher. In addition to being a frequent performer with the OSM, Mr. Manker is a member of the Juno- and Opus-Award winning New Orford String Quartet. A professor at McGill University’s Schulich School of Music, Mr. Manker also initiated the Beethoven Project and founded the Adorno Quartet in 2007, which aims to perform all of Beethoven’s quartets in their original context: a private salon. In 2010, he recorded the Bach Suites for Solo Cello. Brian Manker plays a cello made by Pietro Guarneri of Venice c. 1728-1730 with a bow made by Joseph René Lafleur c. 1850, courtesy of the Canimex Foundation.

PROGRAM:

Sergei Rachmaninoff, Sonata for Cello and Piano in G minor, Op.19

Bohuslav Martinů, Variations on a Slovak theme, H.378

Vítězslava Kaprálová, Ritournelle for piano and cello, op.25

Indoor presentation: Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:00 p.m. at the PHI Centre

Webcast (on demand) from May 29 to June 12

Information and tickets, it’s here.

The music scene in Montreal, circa 2007, welcomed a new unorthodox, one-of-a-kind chamber music quartet whose members went on to collaborate with artists such as Arcade Fire, Hey Rosetta, The Barr Brothers, Sarah Pagé, Chilly Gonzales, Patrick Watson, etc. This quartet is called the Warhol Dervish String Quartet, and is more of a collective—a rotating cast of chamber music players, that in the beginning, cut their teeth in punk rock DIY arts venues around Montreal and now often tour as the strings section for a number names in the music world.

Violist and director of Warhol Dervish, Pemi Paull, has been with the collective since day one. Along with the collective, his performances over the next few weeks are during a concert series called Beethoven Mystique. The concert series is a collaboration between Warhol Dervish and local acts Paper Beat Scissors (Mar 23) Katie Moore (April 20), Brad Barr (May 1), Sarah Pagé (May 11), and Thanya Iyer (June 22). The idea is to put new life into the last string quartets of one of history’s greatest composers while conveying the synergy and potential of chamber music and contemporary music artists. 

PAN M 360 spoke with Pemi Paull ahead of the second Beethoven Mystique show, about the inspiration behind the concert series, choosing which artists to feature, and the gradual shift of acceptance for chamber music and contemporary collaborations in North America. 

Beethoven Mystique Concert Dates at La Chapelle Scènes Contemporaines
Wednesday, April 20th – Quartet No 15, Op. 132 + Katie Moore
Sunday, May 1st – Quartet No 14, Op. 131 + Brad Barr
Wednesday, May 11th – Quartet No 16, Op. 135 + Sarah Pagé
Wednesday, June 22nd – Quartet No 13 and 17, Op. 130/133 + Thanya Iyer

PAN M 360: Hey Pemi how are you today? 

Pemi Paull: I’m OK. Sorry, my voice is a little off today ‘cause I’m on the tail end of COVID. I just got back from touring on Monday with another group and like half of us got COVID.

PAN M 360: That definitely seems to be the reality of touring nowadays. Which group was that?

Pemi Paull: Ensemble Caprice. It’s a baroque music collective. So we lost a singer at the beginning of the tour and then a trumpet player and yeah, it was COVID. Some of the people in my Warhol Dervish group were on tour as well, and five of them got COVID last week as well. 

PAN M 360: I guess you’ll all be cured by the times of the shows though? 

Pemi Paull: Yeah we’re gonna be super vaxxed by then. Have all three of the vaccines plus a case of COVID. So super immunity.

PAN M 360: So is Warhol Dervish like a rotating cast of players?

Pemi Paull: Yeah it’s a collection. It’s always been a collective, but there are certain core members in the string quartet and it’s flexible because we’re all over the place all the time doing a million different things. For this performance, we have four violinists that are rotating between shows.

PAN M 360: Where did the initial idea for this concert series come from?

Pemi Paull: Well we first made contact with theatre La Chapelle when we did a run of shows in 2017. And we talked about doing a series of concerts around some themes. I’ve always wanted to do a Beethoven cycle all my life. I’ve played all the Beethoven quartets and that’s the type of music that allows me to express myself as a classical player. These quartets are at the top of my musical repertoire. 

So the theatre came back to us to do these shows and then COVID happened and I proposed five concerts around the five late Beethoven string quartets. Those pieces are like at the summit of chamber music, but they can be quite dense and profound so the idea was to be to experience these quartets with little breaks where people in the Montreal indie community play. The idea is to make the whole time listening to the music as enjoyable and flowing as possible, especially for people who have never heard them before. 

PAN M 360: And how did you go about choosing with Montreal acts would be accompanying which quartet?

Pemi Paull: Well we’ve always collaborated with people outside of the classical world and made many musician friends along the way. But it’s different for everyone. Like Katie (Moore) is playing her own music and choosing her program more in reaction to the fact that we’re playing Beethoven’s Opus 132 rather than the other way around. So we play the quartet and then Katie performs a solo set she’s heard the quartet before, but I’m not even 100 percent sure what she will play.

PAN M 360: So it’s going to be pretty spontaneous?

Pemi Paull: Yeah and like when we did it with Tim (Paper Beat Scissors) it seems like it went even better than expected. Because I think the pacing is really good, where you have that kind of like really high-intensity chamber music that is very visceral, but it doesn’t last very long. The release comes without having to sit there for two hours. It’s very complimentary. 

Katie Moore is performing with Warhol Dervish on Wednesday, April 20

PAN M 360: You and other members of Warhol Dervish have classical, Conservatory training behind you. Has it been hard to kind of leave that when collaborating outside classical music?

Pemi Paull: The culture has really changed. There’s a lot more collaboration now. But I think for me,—I think I’m the oldest person of the Dervishes—I’m a real Gen X guy. There was a big separation when we were young, growing up with classical music and what it represented and what popular music represented. But I think our group was made up of a lot of people who probably had band aspirations, but we started out on string instruments, and the journey with stringed instruments invariably leads you into the classical world, at least at some point. We started at this anarchist art gallery called Zeke’s as the house band. So we were playing pretty independently, booking shows at La Sala Rossa and keeping away from the classical music world. It was easier to operate as a sort of band and play the music we wanted to. 

PAN M 360: So back then, was there kind of a disconnect between you guys and your peers who were playing classical music in a different setting?

Pemi Paull: I think that everyone thought it was cool for the most part, but there is definitely an element of classical music that is all about status with fancy instruments and fancy education. And the way you promote yourself is with that fancy notoriety. But as soon as you start working with bands and things like that, people recognize you because of capitalism. It’s like ‘Oh, we have heard of the bands that you work with’ even more than our own repertoire. It’s just a different way into people’s consciousness.

But there’s a classical world that only wants to have chamber music with competitions and rich kids going to expensive music schools, and you know, it’s a very rarefied field. So I think in North America, it’s really changed. And I think it’s a lot easier to be who you are if you’re trying to promote your own group. And what you are is fine, but there’s also parallel to that—a network of concert series, and competitions, like a classical music establishment of chamber music—and we only have a peripheral amount to do with that.

PAN M 360: You mentioned fancy instruments and you yourself have a viola from the 18th century correct? 

Pemi Paull: Yes so I do a lot of historical performances—which is to say that we play on old instruments and try to recreate the sort of conditions of 18th-century performance. So like using older bows and instruments and everybody in our group does that. Actually, Montreal is a pretty big centre for historical performance. 

But yeah I bought a French viola that was built in 1789, the year of the French revolution, and the guy who built it was a revolutionary who got guillotined, so it has a great story behind it. It’s had a lot of mojo put into it and it’s my main instrument. 

Dan Bejar, known for his work with The New Pornographers, Swan Lake, and most notably, Destroyer—is a walking indie rock enigma. You’d go insane trying to derive true universal meaning from his songs, filled with cryptic language, poetic phrasing about mythical beasts, death, and wonder, and a musical backdrop that dramatically shifts from post-punk, indie rock, free jazz, synth punk. He’s the kind of musician who goes through periods of intensity, almost fugue states as he’s writing his albums, and sometimes forgets the intent almost purposefully. His songs stem from a pure love of language.

For his latest, Labyrinthitis, Bejar once again worked with his longtime collaborator, John Collins to create a wonderfully weird and abstract piece of cryptic indie rock. At one point, he thought he was experiencing some sort of sickness, brought on by periods of vertigo and ringing in his ears. He looked up his symptoms and found the word “Labyrinthitis,” which he still admits sounds like a made-up word. 

We spoke with Dan about some of the mysterious sounds and phrases on his latest album, his love of Jim Morrison, his weird relationship with Nick Cave’s music, and references to dark magic. 

 

PAN M 360: Hey Dan. How’s your day so far? 

Dan Bejar: It’s been pretty easy. Went for a stroll in the sun, and bought some bread. How about yours? 

PAN M 360: I just came back from a Nick Cave exhibition opening here in Montreal. 

Dan Bejar: What is that even? What do you go and look at as you stare at the walls?

PAN M 360: It’s basically laid out so every room is a different chapter of his life. His Berlin years or how we started the Bad Seeds and all that and then at the very end, he appeared and did a little media Q&A. 

Dan Bejar: I’d like to be in the kind of the house that he was squatting in with a friend or whatever, where he has a bunk bed and his typewriter setup. There’s some famous picture of him in Berlin, working away on that book and looking pretty gnarly. I think that would be a pretty cool room to recreate.

PAN M 360: Would you ever consider having an exhibition on your trajectory as an artist. A Destroyer exhibit in Canada or something?

Dan Bejar: I don’t think so. I mean, it’d be funny to be approached about such a thing. I think you probably have to buy into your living legend status. Which is understandable if you’re Nick Cave because that’s where he’s at right now. Like there’s a Bob Dylan museum opening in Tulsa or somewhere like that. I think it’s probably a similar vibe. But no one’s knocking on my door asking for copies of my correspondences or anything like that. 

PAN M 360: We can get off of Nick Cave, but one thing he talked about was ego being an absolute killer when you’re so revered. How is that as an accomplished artist yourself?

Dan Bejar: It’s interesting, especially in North America, he’s had this kind of a slow and steady rise to the kind of Godhead figure of English language songwriting. So maybe when it’s a slow and steady rise like that, as opposed to just like a pop version, where you explode onto the scene and are just massive and then you disappear, it makes it seamless and less weird to recreate the different rooms of your life in an institution.

I have like a deeply conflicted relationship with the guy in that he’s written songs that are among my very favourite songs and put out records that I’m really attached to. I don’t really know the stuff between The Good Son and The Boatman’s Call, which are two of my favourite records. I did spend a lot of time listening to Skeleton Tree, which I thought was weird because that’s not a record you really just throw on while you’re doing the dishes.

PAN M 360: Have you seen parallels between his music and yours throughout the years?

Dan Bejar: Maybe but I also have a contentious relationship with him, because I know that he has a really strong work ethic. He has kind of an office space where he goes, and he just punches the clock and shoots, like a nine to five job. And I’ve just never been able to do it. It’s so different from how I operate.

PAN M 360: Yeah I feel you’re more of the guy who has a bunch of phone recordings or voice memos, singing things or phrases you find interesting?

Dan Bejar: Yeah I sing ideas. And usually, my ideas show up with melodies attached and that’s why I think they’re singable. It’s like it’s God’s clue that they’re ideas with melodies. And, I’ll string them together because certain ones will talk to others really well. Sometimes it will be chronological, I’ll do a bunch in a row and that will be the song. It wasn’t always like that, though. I used to like have a book that I’d write in and then I’d sit around all day long and strumming the guitar. The chords and melodies would kind of get smushed together at some point. And that was like Destroyer for definitely for the first 10 or 12 years. 

PAN M 360: And I’ve noticed that you have been adding more musical space in your music. I think Kaputt was when I took note of it. But this album really has lots of room for each instrument to breathe and the vocals are sometimes very minimal. Was that a conscious choice?

Dan Bejar: Yeah I think so. Compared to the way I used to write, which was kind of almost like a dare or a trick, like trying and fit all this language into a song. That’s not really the case anymore. That’s why the song “June” was really fun was because I could just lay into that shit and narrate these strange images and strange situations and just treat it as an acting job. 

“June” music video

PAN M 360: You’re talking about the spoken word part in June where you just kind of go crazy?

Dan Bejar: Yeah just being free of song structure once and for all. That was kind of like one of the illuminating and terrifying liberation moments on the record.

PAN M 360: Yeah it’s almost like slam poetry. Definitely the wildest moment on the record. 

Dan Bejar: You know there would have been a time in my life where someone said, ‘This feels like slam poetry to me.’ I would have thrown myself off a cliff. But I don’t know. Where I’m at right now. I’m kind of just fine with that. I went into it the way Jim Morrison would approach it. 

PAN M 360: He’s someone you’re usually trying to channel?

Dan Bejar: I mean as a singer, and as a poet, he speaks to me more than someone like Nick Cave. It seems to be like just a shadow that I can’t help a walk in these days. I think about it all the time. That being said, I think I try and channel a bloated middle-aged version of him … not the young Dionysian version. 

PAN M 360: That’s a little self-deprecating no? 

Dan Bejar: I just understand what I currently am. I’m turning 50 this year so it might be hard for me to get into the leather pants right now. 

PAN M 360: We spoke once before, maybe five years ago, and you told me that you want Destroyer songs to feel like a random page in a spy novel. Do you still agree with that statement?

Dan Bejar: That’s funny. I totally 100% agree with that, but I didn’t think I was feeling that five years ago. But I’m pretty consistent these days. I have really just two or three hang-ups and I guess that’s one of them espionage but in a really disoriented way—just like cut up, cut up espionage.

PAN M 360: I Googled “Labyrinthitis” and found that its to do with an inner ear infection and periods of vertigo? Did you experience that?

Dan Bejar: I’m still not really sure what it is. I did have a phase where I guess I had really bad what you call tinnitus symptoms. Like the ringing of the ears, and hearing loss. I wasn’t listening to music because it was painful. I definitely couldn’t be around the loud sound. And it seemed to be accompanied as well with yeah, fucking vertigo man. I mean, the tinnitus … just comes with the territory of exposing yourself to really loud rock music for 30 years. And the vertigo was just a weird new thing. It flared up and it went away within a week or so. But you know, it was one of those moments last year where I was like ‘What the hell’s going on?’ And I came across that word. I kind of lost interest in any kind of self-diagnosis and the more I got into it, I looked at that word as a jumble of letters and it sounded completely made up. 

PAN M 360: I honestly thought it was a made-up word as well. 

Dan Bejar: Right? It looks 100% made-up and if it’s not made up someone made up that definition in the last 10 years. It seems like too much out of some like Italian modernist, short story, or something. I just kept thinking about it. I like the connotations of it, not so much the clinical stuff, but the connotations of like disorientation, vertigo, and nausea. And I like the connotations of just what definitions you can invent for yourself. Like, is it about being addicted to mazes? Maybe the idea of getting lost is a clinical condition.

PAN M 360: Getting lost in a labyrinth. 

Dan Bejar: Yeah or trapped. It also kind of implies a spell or some kind of magic, potentially, like evil, dark magic (laughs). Perhaps even some kind of beast that lurks inside the labyrinth that is your undoing.

PAN M 360: There’s that line in “Tintoretto, It’s for You” ‘Do you remember the mythic beast.’ Is that where that idea came from?

Dan Bejar: I gotta say that the song was finished before I found the word. That’s just kind of how my mind works and I gravitate to certain words. So I’m not surprised it all connects. It’s a weird song, but when I just kind of scan it peripherally, it seems to be like a pretty steady meditation on the Grim Reaper coming to knock on your door, telling you it’s time.

Last summer, the little punky-pop bombshell “Chaise Longue” introduced Wet Leg to half the world.

Before this 3.17 minutes of pure contagious happiness that collected millions of views and listens, nobody had heard of this duo out of nowhere. Well, not quite out of nowhere, since the two main protagonists of Wet Leg come from the Isle of Wight, off the coast of Albion.

If many thought that the success of “Chaise Longue” would be short-lived and that Wet Leg would be just another one-hit-wonder, we have to admit that the duo was quite inspired when creating the twelve tracks of this first album, simply entitled Wet Leg, and unveiled just recently. Buoyed by the resounding success of “Chaise Longue,” Rhian Teasdale and Hester Chambers have seen their little island lives turned upside down, becoming overnight darlings of the music press, with all the hype that comes with it.

A few weeks ago, PAN M 360 managed to catch the two accomplishments while one was on her island and the other was in London. They wanted to do the interview together. Mischievous, mocking, not very talkative but often giggling, Rhian and Hester told us about their homeland, wet legs, the fun they want to continue having while making music, and the weight of success.

PAN M 360: When and how did the Wet Leg adventure begin?

Hester Chambers: In 2018, at the End of The Road festival. Rhian had her solo project RHAIN that wasn’t motivating her too much anymore, and she was about to give up. But for a few festival dates she had already agreed to do, she asked me to play guitar with her. To our surprise, things were going pretty well between us and it was after that show at the End of The Road that we seriously talked about forming a band. We also more or less participated in a few projects together but it wasn’t our project. You know, sometimes you have good intentions and decide to form a new project but then everyone is too busy with other things or it’s hard to find a place where everyone can rehearse and blah blah blah, but we stuck with it!

Rhian Teasdale: Yeah, it’s pretty crazy that we managed to do it (shy laugh)

PAN M 360: How did you meet? You knew each other for a while I guess.

Rhian Teasdale: Yeah, we’ve known each other for a while. We met when we were in college, but we never really thought about starting a band together until about a decade ago.

PAN M 360: Basically, Wet Leg was more of a project that you started with the sole intention of having fun without complicating your life. But with all your success and all that it implies, is it still the case?

Rhian Teasdale: Yes, but we’re really busy, we work a lot Hester and I. It’s pretty crazy. We never thought about doing this very seriously, we started Wet Leg just for the fun of making music together, really. A few months ago, I was telling Hester that I had to go to work on our project after the vacation, and it felt weird to call it “work.”

Hester Chambers: Oh yes, so much! For a long time it was just a hobby for us. It was after we got signed by Domino’s that we started calling it “work”… It felt weird to say that. Because we never thought of it as a job, we were just hanging
out.

PAN M 360: Music and work are not words that go together very well, are they?

Rhian Teasdale: I think calling it work, a job or a career is weird. It feels really strange to call it that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB3PJwPMHzQ&list=PLgKiYLL7gGMGHPJHuk-ap88PBDqVcy8nO&index=4

PAN M 360: What does Wet Leg mean, is it a typical Isle of Wight expression?

Hester Chambers: Yes, it’s a local epithet to describe those who are not from the Isle of Wight. People who have crossed the Solent (the inlet that separates the Isle of Wight from England) to get to the island are said to have wet legs when they get off the boat. We’re surrounded by water so no matter where you go on the island, you’ll often get your feet wet.

Rhian Teasdale: We thought about naming the band Wet Egg, but we thought Leg would be more relatable, more understood by most people.

PAN M 360: You were both born and raised on the island?

Hester Chambers: No, we weren’t born on the island, but we’ve spent a lot of our lives there since we were little.

PAN M 360: There are several well-known musicians from the Isle of Wight, for example, The Bees, Get Shakes, Mark King from Level 42/Re-Flex, Dick Taylor from Pretty Things (and briefly from the Rolling Stones), David Steele from English Beat/Fine Young Cannibals, the drummer from Hanoi Rocks, and many others. Can we say that there is a pretty dynamic music scene on the island?

Hester Chambers: We love The Bees! Yes, it’s a really creative place. There are so many bands and artists that come from there. There’s always a show somewhere although there aren’t really any cool venues. There’s only one really (chuckles). We’ve been playing here and there on the island since we were 17 or 18. In fact, I would say we’ve spent a lot of our time playing all over the island.

PAN M 360: I imagine there are fewer distractions than in London for example; you have quite a bit of time to rehearse and perform. And then there is always the famous Isle of Wight Festival…

Hester Chambers: Yes, but it’s quite different now. It’s nothing like it was in the ’70s. When we were younger, it was really something to look forward to at the beginning of the summer. Just running around and seeing really cool bands… We’re really lucky to have been able to experience that. And then there was the Bestival too.

Rhian Teasdale: The Isle of Wight Festival is at the beginning of the summer and Bestival is at the end. It was really good but it’s no longer held on the island (the event was relocated to Dorset in 2017 and even went as far as Toronto with two editions in 2015 and 2016). It was much better, it was smaller than the Isle of Wight Festival.

PAN M 360 : You recorded Wet Leg in April 2021 but the album was only released on April 8, a year later. Why did you wait so long, especially after the enormous success of Chaise Longue.” This song was still released last June.

Hester Chambers : We didn’t have much to do during the pandemic, so we were trying to be productive, to maximize our time. And it was quite a long process afterward. We didn’t finish everything last spring, there was the mix that took some time. And we didn’t really know how things were going to turn out after “Chaise Longue.”

PAN M 360 : Tell us about this chaise lounge. Is that what you call those beach or pool chairs?

Rhian Teasdale: I know in French it’s like beach chairs, but in English, a chaise longue is what you call a récamier.

PAN M 360 : How was this song born?

Hester Chambers: We were hanging out in a living room and Joshua (Omead Mobaraki, one of the three musicians in the band) put out a nice beat from his machines, we added a bass line, it was just a little stupid jam and during that time Rhian was sitting on a chaise longue.”

Rhian Teasdale: It was quite an accidental jam and it was never meant to go any further than that.

PAN M 360: A happy accident!

Hester Chambers and Rhian Teasdale : Yes, yes, exactly!

PAN M 360: You have accumulated more than 11 million views on Youtube with your six clips (3.9 million only for Chaise Longue) and the number of streams is close to 50 million…Does all this overtake you a little bit, do you feel a certain pressure?

Rhian Teasdale: Hmm… That’s a little too much, isn’t it? Personally, I try not to think about it too much and focus my energy on the good things people tell us. I don’t know… um… but it’s true that there’s a lot of hype (laughs).

PAN M 360: Do you feel that there is a strong expectation from the public, that they expect you to live up to all this hype?

Rhian Teasdale : We’ll see, we do what we have to do and que sera sera !

Under the theme “La grande vague: Alma et La Mer”, the Orchestre Métropolitain presents on Friday evening (Maison symphonique, 7:30 PM) a work by the Italian composer Paola Prestini, whom PAN M 360 is dedicated to introducing. Conducted by Kensho Watanabe, the OM will perform an early work by Prestini, « Barcarola », followed by Alma Mahler’s « Seven Lieder » and « La Mer, three symphonic sketches » by Claude Debussy.

Considered one of the compositional leaders of her generation on the global new music scene, Paola Prestini is also a leading activist and organizer.  

A graduate of the prestigious Juilliard School of Music, she studied with Samuel Adler, Robert Beaser and Sir Peter Maxwell Davies. Most recently, she was named one of Musical America’s “30 Innovators.  

Throughout her career, Paola Prestini has traversed musical genres and eras of repertoire. Open to multidisciplinarity, she has collaborated with writers, filmmakers, and scientists in the context of world-class multimedia works.

She was the first woman to participate in Minnesota Opera’s New Works Initiative with Edward Tulane. Her upcoming chamber opera Sensorium Ex, commissioned by Atlanta Opera and Beth Morrison Projects for the Prototype Festival, explores the intersection of artificial intelligence and disability, using non-verbal or atypical speech patterns to explore the fundamental questions of what it means to have a voice, and what it means to be fully and essentially human. 

As part of her commitment to equity for the next generation of artists, she created the Hildegard Commission for emerging female, transgender, and non-binary composers, as well as the Blueprint Fellowship for emerging composers and female mentors at The Juilliard School.

A native of Italy, she is the co-founder and artistic director of the Brooklyn-based arts institution and incubator National Sawdust. 

As for the work on the program, here’s her own explanation from the program for Friday night’s 7:30 p.m. performance at the Symphony House

“The work, which lasts about fifteen minutes, unfolds like a wave in the rhythmic sway of the Venetian barcarole form. It is inspired by the poem Barcarole, by Pablo Neruda, who compares desire to the ocean and its storms. The poem makes the sounds of the wind and the foghorn sound like a beating heart, and the impression is spectral and sensual. The poem plays with structural shifts, and then, having reached the highest peak of desire, it concludes with a simple heartbeat.”

And since the appetizer is going well, let’s talk directly to Paola Prestini! 

PAN M 360 : What have you mainly developed sonically, as a contemporary composer?

PAOLA PRESTINI :  I’ve developed a strong love of multimedia creation which extends from operatic works, to works that have blurred boundaries and helped create dialogue among often unrelated fields. From a cantata that fused the Hubble Telescope images with VR, to a music documentary that explored the history of the Colorado River with a conservationist, to my current work at the intersection of opera, community practice and disability activism, all my work is an iniquiry for me into worlds I yearn to discover and learn from.

PAN M 360 : What is your relation with the different periods of classical music since ancient music? 

PAOLA PRESTINI :   I love renaissance music and medieval chants, I actually taught 16th century counterpoint at Juilliard while doing my Masters, so often this somehow appears in the direct nature of my vocal writing, I believe.

PAN M 360 : Some people tend to think there is an interesting link betwwen ancient/Renaissance/baroque music and contemporary music… are you one of them? If yes, how would you elaborate on this observation?

PAOLA PRESTINI :  I think this can be true especially as operatic work today is told more in chamber music settings, often in site specific settings. As far as the vocal writing itself, it’s a hard assessment because contemporary styles are so vast today. In my own music I see the influence because I PANstudied ancient/renaissance music deeply. So the connections in lyricism, counterpoint, and clarity are there. I also think there’s a connection in neume notation and design to score notation now. It’s a fascinating connection to continue examining…

PAN M 360 :  Were some composers a crucial influence on your work – if this question is relevant for you?

PAOLA PRESTINI : It is relevant! I’m passionate of  the music and writings of John Cage: his Sonatas and Interludes and musings on Silence.  The music of Palestrina and Victoria are essential, and the music of Crumb, Meredith Monk, John Zorn, and composers who are my contemporaries, like Tanya Tagaq…and folk music of Italy and Mexico from the past and present has played a huge role in my musical diet.

PAN M 360 : How do you deal with sacred music and how do you inject it in your actual vocal work?

PAOLA PRESTINI : I recently wrote for an extraordinary group from Leipzig called Sjaella and I would say that their background in sacred music and facility with complex lines, and their special blend when their voices come together was a huge inspiration in the works I wrote for them. From a new work called Tryptich of our Time to a womens view on brotherhood called Fratres after Palestrinas Fratres Ego enim accepi, sacred music provides a base I love to extrapolate from.

PAN M 360 : Barcarolla has been composed in the 90’s, when you were emerging as a composer. Can you explain the inspiration of this piece, the way it has been designed, and what remains in your craft from this period of sonic creation? What do you expect from Orchestre Métropolitain, maestro Watanabe and other participants?

PAOLA PRESTINI :  I’m so excited to work with the Orchestre Metropolitain and Maeastro Watanabe to shape this work. When you’re a student it can be hard to ask questions because often you’re afraid of what you don’t know. So in shaping the work, Maestro and I have already asked questions on dynamics, articulation, and structural pacing that I think will help the arc of the piece in a clearer way. As for what I’ve taken with me, I still hear the dense harmnonies punctuated by dissonance, the melodic clarity, the passion, and to this day I am moved daily by poetry. The sounds in the poem influenced the way I wanted to convey color while painting the sounds of an ocean, and though my language has evolved, there is a clarity in intention to this piece that makes it still relevant in my catalogue of work.

PAN M 360 : How would you tell us the way your approach has changed since?

PAOLA PRESTINI :  I would say that my deepened sense of rhythm, structure and overall facility with technology is a direction that has influenced my work. I also have had more opportunities to write for the voice, so it’s exciting to return to this form which is so seminal for all composers.

PAN M 360 : Over the years, what are for you the main steps of your creative work ?

PAOLA PRESTINI : I tend to love coming up with a theme and creating sketches of work that help me explore: a type of R&D process of you will! During this time I like to work with musicians to stretch my knowledge and play so that that creative exchange shows up in the work. I’m definitely a collaborator and feel that my music and work is deepened in collaborative exchange. 

PAN M 360 : Living in Brooklyn,  you are co-founder and artistic director of the Brooklyn-based arts institution and incubator National Sawdust.  Are you still involved with this organisation? Wha activism means for you?

PAOLA PRESTINI :  I’m the cofounder and artistic director at National Sawdust, so I’m involved at a macro level of planning and artistic structure. I also love to be involved in the mentoring programs I’ve started as this type of work is my kind of activism. We focus on women and non-binary artists in commission based programs that mean the world to me. But the space is run by an amazing team of commuted administrators. I feel lucky to have helped create a space for new music in my hometown.

PAN M 360 : What about your Italian identity in New York?  You are often presented as an Italian American, so?

PAOLA PRESTINI :  I was born in Italy and my Italian identity means a lot to me. From the culture to language to family to food! I recently came back from a stay in Rome as a resident at the American Academy of Rome and it was an incredible experience. To be able to live in Rome and be influenced by the lifestyle and people was a great gift and makes me even more grateful for my heritage. But like all Americans, I am a mix of many cultures. My time on the Arizona/Mexico border also influenced me greatly, as has the twenty+ years I’ve been in the city. It’s all part of me. It helps me see more clearly.

PHOTO credit :  Caroline Tompkins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzRorHIhwTQ

The second floor of Studio TD, the new name given to L’Astral for obvious sponsorship reasons, has been transformed into an atypical museum: under the title “Stranger Than Kindness,” an exhibition devoted to Nick Cave will be presented there as of Friday, April 8.

Originally for the Black Diamond, the modern extension of the Royal Danish Library in Copenhagen, this exhibition was imagined by curator Christina Back with Nick Cave as co-curator and co-designer. The exhibition features hundreds of objects accumulated or created over six decades. This is a unique foray into the creative world of Nick Cave, this atypical exhibition. Beyond the evocations of the famous artist, we look at what shapes an existence and what builds a human being.

Never before has Montreal experienced such an immersion in the world of the Australian writer and avant-garde rocker, one of the most brilliant of the current era. Since Montrealer Victor Shiffman, who produced the famous Leonard Cohen exhibition, is the producer of this exhibition, Montreal is honored to host the event, which was preceded by a pair of memorable concerts in Salle Wilfrid-Pelletier at Place des Arts last weekend, orchestrated by Warren Ellis and Nick Cave, joined by three backup singers and a multi-instrumentalist.

The aesthetics of Carnage, a record led by Cave and Ellis as a duo, dominated a repertoire that consisted mostly of this 2021 recording and also of Bad Seeds songs written over the past decade under the musical direction of the same Warren Ellis, without whom Nick Cave would not be what he musically is today.

Thus, several Montreal journalists from institutional and independent media (Radio-Canada, CBC, The Gazette, La Presse, PAN M 360, Sors-Tu, etc.) were given a 49-minute and 49-second conversation with Nick Cave, at the heart of the exhibition dedicated to him. Here are most of the quotes, adapted by PAN M 360.

Photo credits: Jérôme Bertrand

Arrival of Nick Cave in this room illustrating the artist’s office, the photographers do their job:

“What are you doing in my office? Oh, well, take the pictures. Hello everyone, I’m Nick Cave. Hello! And yes, this was our last show of the tour so please excuse me if I seem a little distracted or exhausted… It’s just because I am. So, what do you want to know? Is wearing masks an individual choice or a rule? A rule? It’s a little weird… but I don’t know how it works here.”

On Warren Ellis’ keyboard at the concert:

“I think it’s a $300 synthesizer that Warren found that has a really beautiful sound, an emotional sound, instantly melancholy, but also uplifting. So it’s very hard to get rid of!”

Possible correlation between the repertoire of the Montreal concert and this exhibition, a retrospective repertoire of the last decade and the retrospective of a lifetime:

“I don’t know… For an artist who has made 20 albums or written 250 songs, or whatever, most of the songs were ones we’ve played over the last few years. That’s unusual, I think. What we tried to do was to put on a show that focused on work that was close to today. And so it’s pretty much the last three or four albums.

“But there’s also something that parallels this show, because it’s kind of strange for me to walk through this show, I think it very clearly shows the life of a very self absorbed, creative person who had some kind of violent break in her life or even a series of violent breaks. And this piece that we’re in now is the end of something.

“I didn’t realize, even before I walked through it, that this room was representative of a kind of self-absorption, artistic self-absorption without paying attention to anything else.

“And then you walk through this door behind me, and everything changes, and I think I live on the other side of this door. And sitting here now, it’s, it’s like, there’s a strange sense of disconnection towards that. I think a lot of people, a lot of fans love this period. They like all these things, they like my older music, the older forms of it, the associations of the past, the old Bad Seeds musicians. All that kind of stuff, this show represents that too. But there’s something that happens, beyond my control, when you walk through that door. And it requires me to make a different form of music. And I’m personally very proud that we have continued to follow the truth of things, wherever it may lead. And I think this show is a great reminder that the music is just getting quieter and more thoughtful.”

On the concept and intent of all this work of collecting objects that became an archival project:

“I must have had an idea at the time… Like these things laid out in this room in Berlin, stuff that I obviously valued, like these little books that I made and kept because I just thought they were beautiful. But mostly, it’s piles and piles of junk that Christina (curator of the show) had to go through, and, and radically sort through to find the right ones. So it’s not like I had much to complain about Susie, my wife kept everything. She quietly pulled all my stuff out and put it in storage. So there were storage containers that I wasn’t even really aware of, my wife was more interested in conservation than I was. So these things are from the last 25 years, but these little things in the Berlin room are just little things.

How Nick Cave feels about the physical surroundings of this exhibition dedicated to him:

“There’s a certain sense of detachment, it’s kind of like a museum. But at the same time, there’s been a lot of work done in this room, and in the last few days I’ve been adding new work. And there’s new stuff that I had in my pockets, there’s a Tom Waits letter on my bed that I got a few weeks ago on tour. So this piece feels like a piece that can keep changing as the show goes on. From city to city it can grow, this room that we are in can grow. Because I’ve done more things since then, ceramics for example. Yeah, I mean,And I hope that the last hallway, the gratitude hallway, can grow and be different than it was in Copenhagen (the first city where the exhibition was held.”

On the marked presence of Leonard Cohen in the exhibition, on the impact of the Montreal artist in Nick Cave:

“When I was about 14, in Australia, in this little country town where I grew up (Warracknabeal) and had left to go back in the summer for school vacations, I had a friend who was slightly older than me. She invited me to her house, she made me listen to Songs of Love and Hate in this very dark room, with boxes on the windows. And she told me to listen to what is there in a way, throughout this exhibition, through these re-creations of important moments. We don’t make a big deal about it, but that’s why Leonard Cohen is there on the turntable in the room.”

“I was a weird kid growing up in a country town in Australia, I felt like I didn’t fit in, I didn’t understand the same things as the people in this small country town. Then I heard Avalanche, the first song on this album. It was a seismic shift for me. Suddenly, I felt like someone understood me. That voice became the voice of a friend. That followed me for the rest of my career. You put Leonard Cohen more than others on a guitar neck, there was always the tone of his voice, there was always that feeling of listening to a wise friend. And yeah, that’s why it was a huge moment for me to listen to that song. And to understand that there was something else that was putting words to my own feelings of angst and anger and love.”

On books observed in the square: Nabokov, Dostoevsky and other writers who inspired his work:

“I must say I was blown away by Crime and Punishment. I had studied this book in school, thanks to a great literature teacher who had encouraged me to take a deep dive into this literary pool. It really changed me, it had a huge influence on this idea of living your life outside of what you’re expected to do. And I mean, Raskolnikov (the main character in Crime and Punishment) did it in his own way. For me, as an Australian, there was this idea of living beyond the expectations of others, who were told to shut the fuck up, keep their heads down and not make a fuss. It was a very inspiring book in that regard.

“And yes, these books are the touchstones for all of us from my generation. Important things to hold on to. And that to me is one of the things about this exhibit, I personally feel that it has a duty to convey that information, even though it may not be appreciated in the same way as it was when I was young. Times are changing and people are looking for something else. As I get older, I see myself as a sort of custodian of these valuable items. Letting these things come that people easily forget. It doesn’t take long for someone to be forgotten. You think, “How can anyone forget Leonard Cohen?” But not long ago I was talking to an 18-year-old about the Sex Pistols and he said, “Who?” It doesn’t take long to forget. And so it’s worth it to hang on to this stuff.

“Are you afraid to get forgotten?” someone asks.

“Personally, I don’t really mind in that regard, because I have my own exhibition.”

On the presence of locks of hair among the objects in the exhibit:

“There are these particular locks of hair that I had found at a flea market in Berlin. There were three of them, they were the same length, and sewn together at the top. So one, two or three women, I could never tell, had their hair cut simultaneously. And it gave me endless ideas about what really happened to these women. You know, the character in the book I wrote in Berlin (And the Ass Saw the Angel) also had these locks of hair, they’re very present in the book. Because real life blends into this particular book. So it’s pretty amazing that I was able to keep that hair. In fact, my wife gave me a little drawstring bag with her own hair that she cut off, so I could take it with me on tour. I’m not sure what that means or what she expected me to do with it. Anyway, it’s in my suitcase. (laughs)”

On the addition of a letter he recently received from Tom Waits:

“Anything that comes along, anything that I find, anything that I have or receive that may be of occasional interest can find its way into the exhibition. In this corridor of gratitude, particular things have massive importance, like this note from Leonard Cohen, for example, received after the death of my son: “I am with you, my brother”. That is an extraordinary thing to receive, so simple! It spoke to me more than anything I was told at the time. So everything in this piece has tremendous significance, a reference to Elvis Presley (my primary influence) or this letter from Tom Waits who I’ve never met – I’m going to do that soon in New York, in the context of a memorial for the late producer Hal Willner.”

On the veracity of reproducing real places, on how he works in those real places:

“Actually, it’s almost identical. I had an office like this, I came to the office, I worked in the office, it was separate from the rest of my life. It became something I couldn’t do anymore, because I felt like I couldn’t do it anymore. The artistic sacrifice, sitting there and working on things, that vague idea of your own creative genius, or whatever it is, all the relationships you have that disintegrate because you’re so focused on your work, and you’re never there. I realized that afterwards, I found out that it wasn’t me anymore. There were other things about my work that I thought were more important. So now I don’t work the same way, I still work every day, from morning to night, but I don’t do it the same way, pathologically absorbed in myself.”

On the motivation for bringing all these objects together in an exhibition:

“I can’t really say. It means something, doesn’t it? It says a lot about someone who had a sense of self-importance, maybe that’s a bit of an exaggeration. I don’t know if it’s a joke or if it’s for real. What do you think? “

On the photo of Monica Lewinsky, hanging in the exhibition :

“It was taken by photographer Polly Borland, who is a very good friend of mine and has taken many pictures of me. She took a picture of Monica Lewinsky and gave it to me, and it was on a wall in my office. I don’t know why it’s here but I really like this picture. There is this look on her face…”

On Nick Cave’s decidedly less dark state of mind, observed at the concert as well as in the press conference:

“You know, there’s a lot to be happy about right now, especially for a touring band. Because at this point, we’ve managed to tour England, parts of Europe and North America without getting COVID. In the beginning we toured in a bubble, whereas more recently we haven’t really followed any protocol, we’ve been adjusting as we go along. It’s pretty amazing, actually. No one is going to cover your tour, it’s a very risky business to go on tour these days, but we think it’s a very special time to be on tour. The audience is learning to be an audience again, there’s a certain sense of danger within the audience, sitting there in a group of people in a pandemic. There’s also a joyful aspect to being able to get on stage and make music. Personally, it makes me much happier these days than I’ve ever been. I just found a way to make it happen.

“This happiness was hard-earned, it’s an earned happiness, maybe a suicide. I think it just speaks to the value of things, getting on stage, playing your music, being surrounded by friends and playing in front of people who have come to make you feel like these are special moments, moments of joy. Generally speaking, that’s how I see it these days. I think as I get older, the thing to do is eliminate unnecessary things. Wherever I am it’s a huge privilege to be on stage and perform. That’s how we feel when, like last weekend, we were able to play very emotional, very personal, very intimate, vulnerable shows. And yeah I love seeing what Warren (Ellis) gives us with these beautiful musicians and singers It’s kind of a legacy, it’s really something.”

On what was also taken out from his home:

“A group of Vikings (laughs) came to my house and took everything away, emptied my drawers, took my books, unhooked my paintings from the walls, rolled up the rugs, and it’s all here (in the exhibit). And so, oddly enough, I’ve been accumulating different books lately. There’s not as much fiction, there are other kinds of books, religious books for example.”

On his interest in the sacred, the mystical, the religious, gospel and sacred music in his music, the religious objects and books in the exhibition, on the tension between belief and unbelief:

“Yes, there is a tension. I think it’s in that tension that the spiritual engine of my work exists, it’s at the heart of that tension. What I particularly like about Christianity is that it leaves a lot of room for doubt. And so I see myself essentially as a religious person, although I have serious doubts about some things. But I think I’ve come to a point where I’ve realized that I’ve spent my entire adult life, and even my childhood, struggling with the idea of the existence of God and other related ideas. Finally, it seems to me that this struggle is the religious experience itself. The idea of whether God exists or whether God existed becomes almost a technicality. The religious impulse has always been there, it is everywhere, it is not an occasional phenomenon. I think it’s just getting stronger and stronger.”

On the self-absorbed artist:

“When you’re young, especially when you’re making art, you assume that art is everything. That’s what it’s all about. And the artist’s life is something exalted, the supreme state. And, in fact, everything else suffers as a result, your relationships with your children, with your wife, with your friends or in your civic involvement. I discovered the hard way that there were other things more important to me than the creative experience.

“That doesn’t mean my life doesn’t explode in all directions through my artwork. Creatively, there’s so much going on right now. But I think when you’re on your deathbed, or something like that, that I wrote The Mercy Seat might not be the most important thing you know. When I sit down with my wife, I don’t tell her, honey I wrote The Mercy Seat (laughs). There’s something else, I think. When you walk through the door behind that desk, there’s something else, and that’s what this exhibition is trying to say too.

“Piece by piece, this exhibition represents a series of ruptures: childhood, being sent to the city to go to school, the Berlin years… these are a series of states of being that collapse and wither, and move on to the next. And it supports the idea that nothing feels very stable but…there’s something behind that office door that feels more stable: my family, my wife, my kids, my friends.”

On the distinction between work and the deeper self:

“Creative work has its own life, and it has its own understanding of where it should go. For me personally, the intention is different. I feel like the intention has to consist of a certain gradation. It is beyond myself, beyond a kind of enlargement of my own self within which resides an enormous potential to make things better and to do good for people. I understand that because I understand it for myself; I understand it from art, music and other creative things. It helps me a lot. And I don’t know how to stop there. I’m trying to get a song done before Sunday, Sunday always seems to come so quickly.”

At first glance, the meeting of Richie Hawtin alias Plastikman and Chilly Gonzales, two Canadian artists of international reputation, was unlikely. The two knew each other by reputation but their creative worlds, one electronic and the other (mostly) instrumental, were not concomitant. However, thanks to Tiga, another world-renowned local player, the meeting took place and was perfectly conclusive. Under the Turbo label, “Consumed In Key” happens to be an authentic synergy between Plastikman and Gonzales, each of their expressions is magnified, revitalized, and becomes a creative boost for these two highly prolific musicians as we know.

PAN M 360 wanted to know more about this collaboration, Richie Hawtin answered our questions generously.

PAN M 360: The encounter between Richie Hawtin / Plastikman and Chilly Gonzales is obviously fruitful. What are your own impressions of the result? 

RICHIE HAWTIN: We are happy and proud of the result. In a way, it was a guarantee, because I think, you know, you put two focused, talented people together who have their own identities. The only thing that could have gotten in the way would have been each other’s egos. And, you know, when Tiga contacted me during the pandemic and told me that Chilly had started working on this idea and had done three mock-ups, I was baffled. How could anyone else think of a project like “Consumed in Key”? What could they add to it? Of course, Chilly is a very well-known and respected musician. But I didn’t know him, I didn’t know anything about him. But since Tiga has been a big supporter of Plastikman since the early days, there had to be something to this collaboration idea. And so I listened to the demos and I still wasn’t convinced, probably because I’m not a true fan of acoustic music.

PAN M 360: We see that the addition of acoustic music in electronic projects is often superficial, without substance. Most of the time, when we see an inclusion of instrumentals from an electronic point of view, it’s often average, because the musicians invited are not at a high level, and also because the electronic musicians don’t know much about acoustic or instrumental music. 

RICHIE HAWTIN: Yes.  So I thought yes, it was interesting and we should do this project, as long as I was able to control the final mix. I felt like Chilly was approaching the album from his own point of view, a very distinct point of view, and I didn’t want to get into a conversation about the pros and cons of the potential impact of this product. So I think one of the best decisions was to leave it like that and allow Chilly to approach this work as he interprets it, and let him go with it. And that’s what we did. And so I think the collaboration was Chilly’s collaboration with my ghost, our dialogue was what we were doing musically. So he got to know me by composing his first pieces. When he sent them to me, I did the same on my side, I had to think about how to integrate his work.  And it was a very long journey for me, there were, I think, almost a hundred versions of the final.

PAN M 360: We understand that Tiga was a crucial link between you and Chilly Gonzales.

RICHIE HAWTIN: We were both friends of Tiga. Chilly had mentioned to him that he had composed something and that I might be receptive to it. Tiga has a great sense of timing and he became Chilly’s translator of my creative thoughts, knowing that this collaboration was possible and could take us further. He was sort of the executive producer of this project, in the true sense of the word because he was really involved in the exchange between Chilly and myself.

PAN M 360: Can you explain the working method?

RICHIE HAWTIN: Sure. Pieces would come to me via Tiga, as Chilly finished each track. I would send some information back to Tiga, which he would pass on to Chilly. And we would get to a point where Chili’s work was done, until he was completely satisfied with what he had accomplished. Methodically, I then began to go through the recording from beginning to end, because you have to understand that this album is to be consumed from beginning to end, in an order fairly close to the first working version. As I became more involved in this project, I became more sensitive to understanding the pieces Chilly composed. And the pieces started to become more specific, more similar to each other. For a while I thought, okay, maybe in the end I should go back now and have a discussion with Chilly. And finally, no. It was a dance that we had together from a distance, a kind of artistic romance between two approaches.  The beauty of it, actually, is the intimacy of a pianist alone in his studio and me alone with this piano music in my studio. It becomes something really unique. This way of doing things allowed us to each have our creative moments and our moments of asserting our egos, so that our work would be in sync at the end.

PAN M 360: There was a back and forth, so in the context of a virtual relationship.

RICHIE HAWTIN: It was virtual until the final mix. For months, I didn’t get a single direct phone call from him, all the information went through Tiga. And I only met Chilly in person last December, when we shot the first promotional video and gave our first interview. That’s also what attracted me to this unconventional project, it’s part of its charm. 

PAN M 360: It’s a real challenge to get this mix with piano and electronics right. It can easily slip into the cheap new age, while we have a substantial project at the end of the day. It allows everyone to offer a new facet of their work.

RICHIE HAWTIN: And Chilly might tell you that he heard something in this project that challenged him, because it went against his musical education. We could have talked about it but we didn’t. On my side, I was really looking for a new inspiration, reading biographies of jazz musicians like Miles Davis. Although “Consumed in Key” was not meant to be an electronic jazz album, there was this idea of leaving space between the notes, like in Miles Davis’ music. Chilly felt that too. So I think for him it was a challenge to sit down at the piano, wondering how to negotiate with the silence. Once he sent me his work, I also had to ask myself how to respond to it with this open approach.

PAN M 360: From your own perspective, what have you accomplished? How has it changed your own practice?

RICHIE HAWTIN: I connected to the beauty of an organic flow, and realized how important it is to trust your instincts. You know, the further along you get in your career, the more you use technology and this and that. And the more you do it, the more people know what you’re doing… a noise builds up around you, you can lose track… This work with Chilly has allowed me to be intimate with myself again artistically, hold the mirror very, very, very close to my work and refine it. Of course, one does not change oneself fundamentally, but sometimes new flashes can occur. And that’s what happened. I felt that something really special by trusting my intuition, by accepting to see where it would take me. So after so many years, electronic music continues to surprise, challenge and inspire me. 

PAN M 360: Could this material be transposed on stage in the near future?

RICHIE HAWTIN: I don’t think so. It’s not a creative problem, it’s a scheduling problem, as stupid as that sounds. That said, we’re very, very proud and pleased with how it turned out, and if something else exciting comes out of this collaboration, well, we’ll see where it goes. For now, at least I feel really good. It’s beautiful when I listen to this record, it’s beautiful when I see people hearing it for the first time.

These four virtuosos share the same condition: a career as an orchestral musician, soloist, teacher and chamber musician. The New Orford Quartet is made up of four performers with exceptional backgrounds: Jonathan Crow (violin), Andrew Wan (violin), Sharon Wei (viola) and Brian Manker (cello) invite pianist Stéphane Lemelin, also a chamber musician and teacher, to share a program from the Pro-Musica Concert Society’s Carte Blanche series this Sunday at the Phi Center. On the program: Antonín Dvořák, Jessie Montgomery, Amy Beach.

Brian Manker has more on this at PAN M 360.

PAN M 360: Remind us of the stages of the Orford Quartet’s reorganization, from the old line-up to the new.

BRIAN MANKER: The original Orford quartet had a long career, from 1965 until 1991, when they disbanded. The current quartet, the New Orford, was formed in 2009 at the Orford Arts Centre with the support of the original founding members of the former group. We have been playing together for almost thirteen years now!

PAN M 360: What would you say are the main elements of your identity as a string quartet? What are its orienta- tions? What is your preferred repertoire?

BRIAN MANKER : Our identity is definitely informed by all of our other musical pursuits. For example, we have all played the Beethoven symphonies, the piano concertos, the violin concerto (Jonathan and Andrew even as the soloist), the Triple Concerto, etc. This inevitably informs our understanding of Beethoven’s language in a profound way. The same can be said of Ravel, of Dvorak, of Brahms. Our orientations are towards precision, collectivity, and exploration. We like to perform new works by living composers, with an emphasis on Canada and Quebec alongside the great works from the past.

PAN M 360: The staff of the New Orford Quartet is extremely competent, arguably the best in Quebec for a string small ensemble, virtuosity speaking. In your opinion, what are the main qualities of each member?

BRIAN MANKER : Thank you for your high praise! There are many fine ensembles in Quebec and in Canada, it’s an ho- nour to be included in that conversation. As for the main qualities of the members of the group, that is a good question, it’s not easy to answer but I will try. Jonathan has a precise and penetrating intelligence, he possesses a beautiful and singular voice on the violin that is instantly recognizable, a strong leader. Andrew is a communicator, a mediator, he is an amazing violinist and also a strong leader, a powe- rhouse! Sharon is of course a fantastic violist, calm, strong and quiet in manner but with extraordinary energy. She glues the group together in ways that may not at first be clear to the listener, she makes us all better! As for me, I am the lucky person who gets to go along on amazing musical journeys with these wonderful friends.

PAN M 360 : It takes time and a lot of playing to develop a common sound and thus define the collective identity of a chamber music ensemble. Do you think you play enough to achieve this?

BRIAN MANKER : We certainly are striving for a common sound and collective identity. I will let the listener discover what they feel, but I will say that I think we do. We have played 20-25 concerts a year for over ten years with many thousands of hours of rehearsal to prepare ourselves for these concerts as well as the time spent making recordings together. I feel our sound and our style is unique and consistent, so again, yes, I do feel we achieve this.

PAN M 360: This string quartet is a project carried out in parallel with your activities as musicians for the OSM or the TSO. Is it difficult to manage?

BRIAN MANKER : Absolutely. Scheduling is a constant headache but we have become adept at making time for rehearsals and planning our projects.

PAN M 360: We can imagine that a musician of your level no longer feels competitive with Canadian colleagues. So what do you think are the best string quartets in Canada?

BRIAN MANKER : I honestly don’t think of it as a competition, each musician is on their own unique and individual path. Certainly there are some amazing Canadian groups: the St. Lawrence Quartet, the Rolston Quartet, the Bozzini, the Molinari are all excellent. I’m sure I’m leaving out some other terrific quartets.

PAN M 360 : Let’s talk about Sunday’s program: could you comment on each of the works?

* Antonín Dvořák, String Quartet No. 12 in F Major, Op. 96, known as the “American” Quartet

* Jessie Montgomery, “Strum”
* Amy Beach, Quintet for piano and string quartet, Op.67

BRIAN MANKER : The Dvorak is an old favourite of mine and audiences worldwide. A fresh and honest work. I love it!

Jessie Montgomery’s Strum fuses many elements of American music in to a new language all her own. “Strum” makes reference to the many pizzicato effects, imitating a guitar or banjo. This is an exciting new voice that I think we’ll be hearing more from in the future.

The Amy Beach Quintet is a very romantic work, colourful and melodic. It isn’t heard often enough. Q: Could you tell me a little bit about your guest pianist and why they were chosen?

Stéphane Lemelin is an old friend of the New Orford, we have collaborated with him many times and always enjoy our time together in rehearsal and on stage.

PAN M 360 : What are the New Orford Quartet’s upcoming projects? Concerts? Recordings?

BRIAN MANKER : We have more concerts planned in May and June, Next year’s calendar is filling out nicely given the challenges faced by concert presenters during this difficult time. No recordings on the horizon but one never knows! What would you like to hear?

Ces quatre virtuoses partagent la même condition : mener une carrière de musicien d’orchestre, de soliste, de professeur et de chambriste. Le Nouveau Quatuor Orford est constitué de quatre interprètes aux parcours exceptionnels : Jonathan Crow (violon), Andrew Wan (violon), Sharon Wei (alto) et Brian Manker (violoncelle) invitent ce dimanche le pianiste Stéphane Lemelin, également chambriste et enseignant, à partager un programme de la série Carte Blanche de la société de concerts Pro-Musica, ce dimanche au Centre Phi. Au programme : Antonín Dvořák, Jessie Montgomery, Amy Beach.

Brian Manker en dit plus long à Pan M 360.

PAN M 360 : Rappelez-nous les étapes de la refonte du Quatuor Orford. L’ancienne formation et la nouvelle.

BRIAN MANKER : Le quatuor Orford original a connu une longue carrière, de 1965 à 1991, date à laquelle il s’est dissous. La formation actuelle, le Nouveau Quatuor Orford, a été formé en 2009 au Centre d’arts Orford avec le soutien de ses membres fondateurs. Nous jouons ensemble depuis presque treize ans maintenant !

PAN M 360 : Quels sont d’après vous les principaux éléments de votre identité en tant que quatuor à cordes? Quelles en sont les orientations? Quel répertoire privilégiez-vous?

BRIAN MANKER : Notre identité est clairement influencée par toutes nos autres activités musicales. Par exemple, nous avons tous joué les symphonies de Beethoven, les concertos pour piano, le concerto pour violon (Jonathan et Andrew en tant que solistes), le Triple Concerto, etc. Cela nourrit forcément notre compréhension profonde du langage de Beethoven, on peut en dire autant de Ravel, de Dvorak, de Brahms. Nos orientations sont tournées vers la précision, la collectivité et l’exploration. Nous aimons aussi interpréter de nouvelles œuvres de compositeurs vivants, soit en mettant l’accent sur le Canada et le Québec à côté des grandes œuvres du passé.

PAN M 360 : Le personnel du Nouveau Quatuor Orford est extrêmement compétent, on peut dire que cette somme de virtuosité est la plus élevée au Québec pour un quatuor. Quelles sont selon vous les principales qualités de chacun?

BRIAN MANKER : Merci pour vos éloges! Il y a beaucoup de beaux ensembles au Québec et au Canada, c’est un honneur d’être inclus dans cette conversation. Quant aux principales qualités des membres du groupe, c’est une bonne question, ce n’est pas facile de répondre mais je vais essayer. Jonathan est un leader fort, il a une intelligence précise et pénétrante, il possède une belle et singulière voix au violon, immédiatement reconnaissable. Il est un leader fort. Andrew est un communicateur, un médiateur, c’est un violoniste incroyable et aussi un leader, une vraie force de la nature! Sharon est une altiste fantastique, forte tranquille dans ses manières mais avec une énergie extraordinaire. Elle colle le groupe d’une manière qui peut ne pas être apparente au premier abord pour l’auditeur, mais elle nous rend tous meilleurs ! Quant à moi, je suis la personne chanceuse qui peut faire de merveilleux voyages musicaux avec ces merveilleux amis.

PAN M 360 : Pour arriver à circonscrire un son commun et ainsi définir l’identité collective d’un ensemble de musique de chambre, ça prend du temps et beaucoup de concerts. Croyez-vous jouer suffisamment pour y parvenir?

BRIAN MANKER : Je laisse l’auditeur découvrir ce qu’il ressent, mais je dirais que oui. Nous nous efforçons certainement d’avoir une identité sonore et collective commune. Nous avons donné 20 à 25 concerts par an pendant plus de dix ans avec plusieurs milliers d’heures de répétition pour nous préparer à ces programmes, sans compter tout ce temps passé à enregistrer ensemble. Je pense que notre son et notre style sont uniques et cohérents. Alors encore oui, je pense que nous y parvenons.

PAN M 360 : Ce quatuor à cordes est un projet mené en parallèle à vos activités en tant que musiciens pour l’OSM ou le TSO. Est-ce difficile à gérer ?

BRIAN MANKER : Absolument. La planification est un casse-tête constant, mais nous sommes devenus habiles à réserver du temps pour les répétitions et à planifier nos projets.

PAN M 360 : : On imagine qu’un musicien de votre niveau ne se sent plus en concurrence avec les collègues canadiens. Alors quels sont selon vous les meilleurs quatuors à cordes au Canada?

BRIAN MANKER : Honnêtement, je ne considère pas cela comme une compétition, chaque musicien est sur son propre chemin unique et individuel. Il y a certainement des groupes canadiens incroyables : le St. Lawrence Quartet, le Rolston Quartet, le Bozzini ou le Molinari sont tous excellents. Je suis sûr d’oublier d’autres quatuors formidables.

PAN M 360 : Parlons du programme de dimanche : pourriez-vous commenter chacune des œuvres?

BRIAN MANKER : Antonín Dvořák, Quatuor à cordes n° 12 en fa Majeur op. 96, dit « Américain »  : Le Dvořák est un de nos vieux favoris et aussi parmi les préférés du public dans le monde entier. Un travail encore frais et honnête. Je l’aime !

Jessie Montgomery, Strum : Cette pièce fusionne de nombreux éléments de la musique américaine dans une nouvelle langue qui lui est propre. Strum fait référence aux nombreux effets de pizzicato, imitant une guitare ou un banjo. C’est une nouvelle voix passionnante dont je pense que nous entendrons davantage à l’avenir.

Amy Beach, Quintette pour piano et quatuor à cordes, op.67 : C’est une œuvre très romantique, colorée et mélodique. On ne l’entend pas assez souvent.

PAN M 360 : Pourriez-vous parler brièvement de votre pianiste invité, et ce qui en justifie le choix?

BRIAN MANKER : Stéphane Lemelin est un vieil ami du Nouveau Quatuor Orford, nous avons collaboré avec lui à plusieurs reprises et apprécions toujours notre temps ensemble en répétition et sur scène.

PAN M 360 : Quels sont les projets à venir du Nouveau Quatuor Orford ? Concerts? Enregistrements?

BRIAN MANKER : Nous avons des concerts prévus en mai et juin, le calendrier de l’année prochaine se remplit bien, considérant tous les défis auxquels les diffuseurs de concerts sont confrontés avec, particulièrement pendant cette période difficile. Pas d’enregistrements à l’horizon mais on ne sait jamais ! Qu’aimeriez-vous entendre ?

TO BUY YOUR TICKETS FOR THE CONCERT AT CENTRE PHI, SUNDAY 3PM , IT’S HERE

TO BUY AN ACCESS FOR WEBCAST (MAY 1ST AND MAY 29), IT’S HERE

Here they are again, we see them surfing on a wave of the 80’s, exactly four decades after the release of the album “Rhythm of Youth” and its worldwide megahit “Safety Dance”. And now our Men Without Hats are back on duty after a 10-year hiatus in terms of original material: on the Sonic Envy label, “Again Pt.2 follows Again Pt.1”, a mini-album of covers (Lou Reed, David Bowie, The Tragically Hip, etc.) in the distinct manner of the Doroschuk brothers and their accomplices.

An album with a premonitory title, “Love in the Age of War”, was launched in 2012 by the group headed by brothers with Ukrainian origins on their father’s side and who want to remain discreet about the conflict raging on the other side of the Atlantic. So what’s up? Although his most recent texts from “Again pt. 2” deal with global issues, but also with the meaning of existence and creative life. Frontman and songwriter Ivan Doroschuk prefers to talk about music and this is what PAN M 360 will do at his convenience.

In 2021, the EP Again Pt.1 presented the covers recorded in the style of Men Without Hats. Led by brothers Ivan and Colin Doruschuk, the band has never ceased to exist and continues to enjoy themselves alongside guitarist Sho Murray – since 2016.

Sticking to their recipe of spices and herbs digital/analog technology (this including an authentic Prophet 5), Men Without Hats would find their synthpop coolness. In fact, the process has been underway for the past decade during which the band has been touring extensively, but a new creative breeze is indeed confirming this return to the saddle.

PAN M 360: Hello Ivan, I’ll join you in Victoria, where you have been living for a long time, right?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes, it’s been about 20 years.

PAN M 360: The band hadn’t done any original songs for about ten years

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Indeed.

PAN M 360: What have you done in the last ten years?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: We’ve been touring. I’ve been to more regions and countries with this new incarnation of Men Without Hats than when we were touring mostly in North America. In the last few years we’ve toured Scandinavia, South Africa, Australia, Peru and other places we’ve never been before.

PAN M 360: It was apropos, because synthwave has a big following in Europe.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes, in Scandinavia and especially in Germany. Half of our dates are German when we do a European tour. In France, however, we haven’t been invited to play there yet. We are aware of the French interest in synth pop, we have been trying to perform in France for a while… We hope it will happen soon!

PAN M 360: So for the last ten years, you’ve been able to make a living from touring?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Well… Nobody does this tour to make a living. It’s mainly for fun. I live from my previous achievements, actually, the royalties from the Hats and other income from our past successes. Now there is no pressure, it’s not about money but about the passion for music. We don’t feel like we’re competing like we used to. Back then, being in a band was a bit like being on a field hockey team. There was a limited number of spots on the charts, radio spots, clubs in the cities and pages in the newspapers. So it was a competition for the young artists that we were.

PAN M 360: Now that you are independent of fortune, it is the passion to make music.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes! We make music for fun in the context of a changing industry. It’s hard to keep up with it all.

PAN M 360: The title of your previous album, Love in the Age of War, was premonitory, especially since you have Ukrainian origins.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes, but there is always war where there have been humans, that’s not new. So we contribute to peace as we can, and this is my contribution.

PAN M 360: As far as lyrics are concerned, the new album is no different from the previous ones: you deal with global, universal subjects. Rather than exploring intimacy, you seem to prefer to question the fate of the world. What do you think ?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes. The themes of the environment, ecology, human rights and freedom are addressed. Today, we are still conveying this same message, these are universal themes that have always been those of Men Without Hats.

PAN M 360: The intimate world is not a territory of exploration, as it has never been.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: No no. I don’t sing about my ex-girlfriends or my private stories.

PAN M 360: Let’s talk about the sound of this new album.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Many people tell me that this new album is the spiritual descendant of Pop Goes the World (1987), while Love in the Age of War was more electro-pop and techno like “Rhythm of Youth” was in 1982. “Again Pt. 2” is more orchestrated, more instrumentation is more considerable.

PAN M 360: But isn’t the very identity of Men Without Hats more synthetic?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Absolutely. We took a slight detour with Sideways (1991), but even today we remain faithful to our electronic roots.

PAN M 360: We have to, because the band has become a synthpop classic.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes, and I think we were lucky, because today I open the radio and I hear so-called current pop and … completely flooded with typical 80s sounds. Today’s production is often comparable to the 80’s, the sampling, the big drums, etc.

PAN M 360: Tell us about the current line-up.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Besides myself, there is my brother Colin, his daughter Sahara (keyboards, vocals), and Sho Murray, guitarist and co-producer. We are joined on stage by drummer Adrian Waite. We are all on the West Coast. Colin and I are on Vancouver Island (Victoria) and Sho and Adrian live in Vancouver. I’ve lived in Victoria on the waterfront for about 20 years as I said, I have a 19 year old son, I was a stay-at-home dad for 10 years, mom was back at university. That made it easy for me because the area is really magical. Like a huge park. I live on the beach, I couldn’t imagine a better playground. My parents had moved there before me, for the nature and the climate. Only my brother Stephan stayed in Montreal.

PAN M 360: What motivated you to make a new album, ten years after the previous one?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: It was mainly our fans that pushed us to do it. We didn’t make so many albums since the beginning. But our fans were writing to us and asking us when the new album would come out. So I started to make new songs three or four years ago. I wanted to make a solo album, voice and piano, with covers of my repertoire, covers of songs that have marked me. When we redid the Tragically Hip song “Blow at High Dough”, I was curious to see how it would sound with the full band. When I recorded the result I thought I should go on as a group, and make a real Men Without Hats album. The covers, including the “Safety Dance” cover (in ballad form), were released last September and the original songs are out now. It was originally a double album and we finally decided to release it in two parts.

PAN M 360: The new album has 14 original songs. So you were inspired!

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes, we had recorded about 20 songs and we have enough material to release another album soon! We are in writing and production mode.

PAN M 360: How do you see the sound progressing in this new context?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: I still see our vintage sound. The sound hasn’t changed that much. Men Without Hats doesn’t have to adapt so much to the sound of today, it’s more like the sound of today adapts to the sound of Men Without Hats. Except for the “Sideways” album as I said before, our sound has stayed pretty much the same.

PAN M 360: Will you be touring soon?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes, there is talk of a Canadian tour in the fall. We already have dates in Quebec.

PAN M 360: What about your Ukrainian origins in the actual context?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: My paternal great-grandfather immigrated to Manitoba, my grandfather was three years old. So it’s been a very long time and today we don’t have any known family there. My father went back there about 20 years ago, hoping to find members of his distant family, but without success. My mother is not Ukrainian, her family is from Wales. We did not speak the languages, but my father speaks Russian and Ukrainian. On the other hand, Ukrainian music has been passed on in our family. My father is an amateur musician, he used to play with my grandfather at community parties, at barn dances in Manitoba. My father went on to do his masters and PHD at the University of Illinois after which he became a Professor of Physiology at the University of Montreal. My mother was also a professor at McGill University, teaching classical voice.

PAN M 360: And so you were able to count on a career singer mother to become a singer yourself.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Yes, but in fact, my brother Colin also has a training in classical singing, he studied at McGill University and also at the University of Victoria. He actually did my voice ten years ago. I hadn’t made music for a while but I could still sing, but I didn’t know if my voice would hold up for 40 or 50 shows. My brother Colin, on the other hand, is really trained in classical singing, he has even created vocal works, he writes operas, he teaches and therefore knows the techniques of singing. He completely deconstructed my voice and taught me the techniques for several months, after which I was singing better than ever before. I now had the tools to get through it. Now I can do five concerts in a row without any problems.

PAN M 360: Even though your family is of distant Ukrainian descent, it must be quite overwhelming to watch this happen, right?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: I prefer not to comment too much. I just hope that there will be a peaceful resolution, I hope that peace will come soon.

PAN M 360: Copy that. So you’ll be back on stage soon and you’ll be defending the material on your new recordings.

IVAN DOROSCHUK: Since it’s the 40th anniversary of the “Rhythm of Youth” album, we are presenting the complete album in the first part, the second part is a best of of Men Without Hats and some new songs on the program. We were surprised by the length of the first album, more or less 30 minutes, only songs for the radio at the time, so it is easily a set.

PAN M 360: What are you listening to now?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: A lot of things, the first half of the 70s, a lot of electric jazz from the 70s, progressive rock…

PAN M 360: And the current period?

IVAN DOROSCHUK: It does not interest me so much.

Sam Goldberg Jr. is a guy who is kind of all over the Canadian music scene map. He’s a guitarist in the supergroup, Broken Social Scene, played bass in Bodega, and helped guide the alternative rock sound in the early 2000s, he’s been nominated for the Producer of the Year at the Felix awards in Quebec—the list of accolades goes on. 

All throughout his career, peers, and friends always encouraged Sam to release his own solo record, but it wasn’t an easy task. He essentially started from scratch after being disappointed with the result he created and approached the new project as a painter does a painting—by picking a palette of sounds to work with.

The self-titled debut is a fantastic offering of grooving psych-rock but features bongos, flute, saxophone, and a good amount of wah-wah. We spoke to Sam about his creative process, love of the wah-wah and fuzz, and working with the ‘International It-girl,’ Tess Parks. 

PAN M 360: I had no idea what to expect for this solo debut from you and I kind of just threw it on and immediately got the psych-rock/garage influence. 

Sam Goldberg Jr: I wasn’t quite expecting it to turn out that way. I actually, made an entire album before this one. I started in about 2018 and I didn’t really know what I was doing. I just knew I wanted to make a record. I had people over the years saying, ‘Hey, man, you need to do your own record.’ So I made a record and I didn’t like it because there were too many ideas going on. And the songs didn’t fit with the range of my voice—I got a low baritone vocal. And lyrically, it didn’t feel right. And I spent all this money and then I was like, ‘Fuck this. I’m not putting this out. Because I’m not happy with it.’

PAN M 360: That sounds like a bummer. Taking all that time and then starting from square one. What made you try again?

Sam Goldberg Jr: I was hanging with a friend of mine and he was telling me about how Boards of Canada—before they even start an album—they choose the palette of sounds that they’re going to use before they make an album. So at the time, when I shelved the first record I made—this is probably at the very beginning of the pandemic—I said to myself, ‘What are the sounds that I like, currently?’ Similar to how you’re gonna make a painting, maybe choose like six or seven colours, and like that’s all I’m going to use. And at the time, I loved fuzz guitars. I still love fuzz tones. And for some reason I developed … I don’t know where it came from … but a love for the wah-wah pedal. I don’t know why that happened.

But I said to myself, ‘I want to have a fuzz guitar, a wah-wah guitar, bass, drums, my vocal and this one synthesizer I really like called the Korg Delta.’ So it was like, ‘That’s going be the album.’ And then once I had that palette of colours, it just came together so quickly, because there weren’t so many options. Sometimes there are just so many sounds and shit can get stuck and lost. But if you limit yourself to something, it’s really very helpful.

PAN M 360: It was really refreshing to hear the wah-wah pedal all the way throughout this psych-rock record. It’s funny because a lot of guitarists have a wah-wah pedal, but they’ll use it only every now and then. It’s kind of synonymous with the psychedelic genre, but also just like ‘70s funk, but the way that you use it is kind of droney. 

Sam Goldberg Jr: Yeah, you have to be careful, because you’re right. It’s like there’s a 70s funk thing. And you know, I wanted to use it in a way that wasn’t cheesy. There’s some cheesy wah-wah out there.

PAN M 360: That’s what I meant, the cheesy wah-wah sound. 

Sam Goldberg Jr: What’s the guy’s name who played with Mazzy Star? I think he died recently. I can’t remember his name [it’s David Roback], but the way he used a wah-wah was really cool. It’s sort of very messy and sort of in the background, it’s not too apparent. I think maybe that’s where I’d heard of and thought ‘That’s a nice use of the wah-wah.’ But going back to the creation of the record, there was a small window before I made this record, and I shelved the other one, when I wanted to make something mellow. I wanted to make something for like a 3 pm to like 6 pm hanging on the fucking lake or on your deck or whatever. Because I’m a mellow guy and I don’t really like super aggressive music.

I had just seen that movie The Big Lebowski and I was like, ‘What would the Dude’s band sound like? I’m gonna make a record from his perspective.’ He wants to live this chill existence, like all of us and obviously, there are obstacles every fucking second of the day that we need to deal with, but what would his band sound like. I tried that for a while. And some of the songs were sort of dressed up in a more mellow fashion. But then it wasn’t really working and that’s when I discovered the palettes thing. 

PAN M 360: I’d picture The Dude’s band being more acoustic ‘70s folk jam rock like Grateful Dead or something. Very organic sounding. 

Sam Goldberg Jr: Yeah it was definitely mellower but then it got replaced with the fuzz stuff and I don’t know, maybe I just like more intense tones? And maybe I’m just not ready to be that guy sitting on the beach playing an acoustic quite yet. Either way, I’m kind of shocked, to be honest, that I made an album that I’m happy with. I’m just very happy that I put a record out. And that people like it. And you know, it’s being the CBC is spinning it which is cool. Like I didn’t get a grant or FACTOR or anything. I just paid out of my own pocket to make this stuff because I just love making music and I’ll always make it. 

PAN M 360: I played this album when I was just walking in Montreal one night and the song “Sweet Face” came on and I was like ‘Is that Tess Parks’ voice? I’m an avid listener of Brian Jonestown Massacre and they’ve worked with her quite a bit so I immediately recognized her voice and the harmonies you guys have in “Sweet Face” are gorgeous.

Sam Goldberg Jr:  That came at the end of the record. I wanted another voice for again, another colour, and I reached out to a friend and he was like ‘Tess Parks would be perfect on this.’ And of course, I know who she is, and I know who she has worked with. So I was hesitant to reach out because I just feel like I’m just this drip, Orc musician. And she’s, like, International ‘It’ cool girl. But I sent her the song and she right away responded. She’s like, ‘I love this. I want to do it.’ So I was really excited that she did it and I just love her voice. She’s got so much character … It’s so low and growly and raspy. I really want to do some more music with her and I think she’s on board. Maybe a new project or maybe more skating around some of my songs or whatever. But yeah, we both sort of come from the same place and love of certain music, which I didn’t realize so much before. But she’s amazing. I’m a huge fan. I think she really saves the song. 

PAN M 360: And there’s also flute and saxophone on this record. Where did that inspiration come from?

Sam Goldberg Jr: I think there was this band, The Sound Carriers, I think? One summer I was camping with a group of friends and we were sitting there and I heard some flute in just one song I was like, ‘That’s fucking a beautiful sounding instrument.’ And it just sort of I put it in my notes maybe I should put the flute in the song. And you know saxophone as well just, I was having trouble with that first song on the album, “You Lock The Door, I Broke The Window” with the outro. I didn’t want to put another guitar solo. And I just thought, ‘Hey, maybe a sax would be nice there.’ Throughout the album, you’ve got to hear something as sort of a cohesive piece as if it’s one long song. So it’s nice to have little different flavours coming in and out. So it was more of just to allow the ear to have a little taste of something different. 

PAN M 360:  Have you approached playing this album live too?

Sam Goldberg Jr: Yeah, I guess I will. I mean, I wrote the songs so that they would be presentable in a live setting. Because I do enjoy playing live. And I have some guys playing with me—one of the guys who plays in Broken Social Scene as well, Brendan Canning on bass. I got Sam Roberts’ drummer, Josh Trager is playing with me. And this really amazing guitarist who goes by Champagne James Robertson. Someone recommended him to me in the beginning, and I saw him play some stuff on YouTube. I was like ‘There’s no fucking way this guy’s gonna play with me.’ And I sent him the record and he liked it. So yeah, some live shows will happen.

Subscribe to our newsletter