{"id":18301,"date":"2020-04-27T17:48:00","date_gmt":"2020-04-27T21:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/panm360.com\/2020\/04\/27\/bob-dylan-a-murder-most-foul\/"},"modified":"2023-10-02T15:01:55","modified_gmt":"2023-10-02T19:01:55","slug":"bob-dylan-a-murder-most-foul","status":"publish","type":"quoi_voir","link":"https:\/\/panm360.com\/en\/quoi-voir-360\/bob-dylan-a-murder-most-foul\/","title":{"rendered":"Bob Dylan : \u201cA Murder Most Foul\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The origin of \u201cA Murder Most Foul\u201d is unclear; it could be an outtake from Tempest<\/em> (2012). The “unclassifiable” work, evoking a litany or a lament, is nonetheless a blues song. The harmony is based on the tonic, subdominant and dominant that defines the genre; as does the rhythmic signature in 3\/4 and 4\/4. The opus, seemingly overseen by an orchestra conductor, is however so languid and fluid that the arrangement of piano, strings, and percussion creates the illusion of unstructured, dreamlike volutes that Debussy (or Sufjan) might have put together in their spare time. The clip is absolute in its sobriety: a still frame of JFK stares at the listener during the 16:56 of the chant, close to a liturgical incantation, which alone, really, deserves attention. The talking blues form has often been borrowed by Dylan, adhering to the tradition of the griot\u2019s improvised declamation with social or political connotations (\u201cTalking World War III Blues\u201d, for example). Here, the text is rather chiseled \u2013 the Nobel Prize winner for literature no longer allows himself spontaneity. The beginning is unusually prosaic for Dylan as he relates with lugubrious precision the events of November 22. What follows is a disjointed eschatology, spanning twenty years (1963-1984), zooming in on outlandish references: the British Invasion (\u201960s), Stevie Nicks (\u201970s), Nightmare on Elm Street<\/em> (\u201980s)… Some will see the work of a genius. However, the metaphor of the JFK conspiracy (Dylan evokes a cryptic \u201cthey\u201d) as “death of America\u201d is worn out, and will appeal to a generation that can say they saw Mickey Mantle play. All in all, Stephen King did a better job of bringing the matter up to date (22\/11\/63). Dylan, like Cash, Bowie or Cohen, should be expected to dazzle in the final twilight of his career; \u201cA Murder Most Foul\u201d is not the expected requiem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n